Re: [PATCH 02/22] kvm: mmu: Introduce tdp_iter

[Sean Christopherson]

On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 02:04:49AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/09/20 23:22, Ben Gardon wrote:
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_mask);
> >  
> > -static bool is_mmio_spte(u64 spte)
> > +bool is_mmio_spte(u64 spte)
> >  {
> >  	return (spte & SPTE_SPECIAL_MASK) == SPTE_MMIO_MASK;
> >  }
> > @@ -623,7 +612,7 @@ static int is_nx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  	return vcpu->arch.efer & EFER_NX;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int is_shadow_present_pte(u64 pte)
> > +int is_shadow_present_pte(u64 pte)
> >  {
> >  	return (pte != 0) && !is_mmio_spte(pte);
> >  }
> > @@ -633,7 +622,7 @@ static int is_large_pte(u64 pte)
> >  	return pte & PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int is_last_spte(u64 pte, int level)
> > +int is_last_spte(u64 pte, int level)
> >  {
> >  	if (level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
> >  		return 1;
> > @@ -647,7 +636,7 @@ static bool is_executable_pte(u64 spte)
> >  	return (spte & (shadow_x_mask | shadow_nx_mask)) == shadow_x_mask;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static kvm_pfn_t spte_to_pfn(u64 pte)
> > +kvm_pfn_t spte_to_pfn(u64 pte)
> >  {
> >  	return (pte & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >  }
> 
> Should these be inlines in mmu_internal.h instead?

Ya, that would be my preference as well.