Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] memory: tegra: Add devm_tegra_get_memory_controller()

[Thierry Reding]

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 07:06:27PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 30.09.2020 19:03, Thierry Reding пишет:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 06:53:06PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> 30.09.2020 18:23, Thierry Reding пишет:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:42:56AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> >>>> From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> Multiple Tegra drivers need to retrieve Memory Controller and hence there
> >>>> is quite some duplication of the retrieval code among the drivers. Let's
> >>>> add a new common helper for the retrieval of the MC.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> Changelog
> >>>> v2->v3:
> >>>>  * Replaced with Dimtry's devm_tegra_get_memory_controller()
> >>>> v1->v2:
> >>>>  * N/A
> >>>>
> >>>>  drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>  include/soc/tegra/mc.h    | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >>>>  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> Let's not add this helper, please. If a device needs a reference to the
> >>> memory controller, it should have a phandle to the memory controller in
> >>> device tree so that it can be looked up explicitly.
> >>>
> >>> Adding this helper is officially sanctioning that it's okay not to have
> >>> that reference and that's a bad idea.
> >>
> >> And please explain why it's a bad idea, I don't see anything bad here at
> >> all.
> > 
> > Well, you said yourself in a recent comment that we should avoid global
> > variables. devm_tegra_get_memory_controller() is nothing but a glorified
> > global variable.
> 
> This is not a variable, but a common helper function which will remove
> the duplicated code and will help to avoid common mistakes like a missed
> put_device().

Yeah, you're right: this is actually much worse than a global variable.
It's a helper function that needs 50+ lines in order to effectively
access a global variable.

You could write this much simpler by doing something like this:

	static struct tegra_mc *global_mc;

	int tegra_mc_probe(...)
	{
		...

		global_mc = mc;

		...
	}

	struct tegra_mc *tegra_get_memory_controller(void)
	{
		return global_mc;
	}

The result is *exactly* the same, except that this is actually more
honest. Nicolin's patch *pretends* that it isn't using a global variable
by wrapping a lot of complicated code around it.

But that doesn't change the fact that this accesses a singleton object
without actually being able to tie it to the device in the first place.

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature