Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: don't set limits.discard_granularity as 0

[Adrian Hunter]

On 30/09/20 7:08 pm, Coly Li wrote:
> In mmc_queue_setup_discard() the mmc driver queue's discard_granularity
> might be set as 0 (when card->pref_erase > max_discard) while the mmc
> device still declares to support discard operation. This is buggy and
> triggered the following kernel warning message,
> 
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 135 at __blkdev_issue_discard+0x200/0x294
> CPU: 0 PID: 135 Comm: f2fs_discard-17 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6 #1
> Hardware name: Google Kevin (DT)
> pstate: 00000005 (nzcv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
> pc : __blkdev_issue_discard+0x200/0x294
> lr : __blkdev_issue_discard+0x54/0x294
> sp : ffff800011dd3b10
> x29: ffff800011dd3b10 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff800011dd3cc4 x26: ffff800011dd3e18 x25: 000000000004e69b x24: 0000000000000c40 x23: ffff0000f1deaaf0 x22: ffff0000f2849200 x21: 00000000002734d8 x20: 0000000000000008 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000394 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 00000000000008b0 x9 : ffff800011dd3cb0 x8 : 000000000004e69b x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0000f1926400 x5 : ffff0000f1940800 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000c40 x2 : 0000000000000008 x1 : 00000000002734d8 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace:
> __blkdev_issue_discard+0x200/0x294
> __submit_discard_cmd+0x128/0x374
> __issue_discard_cmd_orderly+0x188/0x244
> __issue_discard_cmd+0x2e8/0x33c
> issue_discard_thread+0xe8/0x2f0
> kthread+0x11c/0x120
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
> ---[ end trace e4c8023d33dfe77a ]---
> 
> This patch fixes the issue by setting discard_granularity as SECTOR_SIZE
> instead of 0 when (card->pref_erase > max_discard) is true. Now no more
> complain from __blkdev_issue_discard() for the improper value of discard
> granularity.
> 
> Fixes: commit e056a1b5b67b ("mmc: queue: let host controllers specify maximum discard timeout")

That "Fixes" tag is a bit misleading.  For some time, the block layer had
no problem with discard_granularity of zero, and blk_bio_discard_split()
still doesn't (see below).

static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q,
					 struct bio *bio,
					 struct bio_set *bs,
					 unsigned *nsegs)
{
	unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity;
	int alignment;
	sector_t tmp;
	unsigned split_sectors;

	*nsegs = 1;

	/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same.  */
	granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);


> Reported-by: Vicente Bergas <vicencb@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> index 6c022ef0f84d..350d0cc4ee62 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static void mmc_queue_setup_discard(struct request_queue *q,
>  	q->limits.discard_granularity = card->pref_erase << 9;
>  	/* granularity must not be greater than max. discard */
>  	if (card->pref_erase > max_discard)
> -		q->limits.discard_granularity = 0;
> +		q->limits.discard_granularity = SECTOR_SIZE;
>  	if (mmc_can_secure_erase_trim(card))
>  		blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_SECERASE, q);
>  }
>