Re: [PATCH v3 seccomp 1/5] x86: Enable seccomp architecture tracking

[Jann Horn]

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:21 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:19:12AM -0500, YiFei Zhu wrote:
> > From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Provide seccomp internals with the details to calculate which syscall
> > table the running kernel is expecting to deal with. This allows for
> > efficient architecture pinning and paves the way for constant-action
> > bitmaps.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [YiFei: Removed x32, added macro for nr_syscalls]
> > Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
> But otherwise, yes, looks good to me. For this patch, I think the S-o-b chain is probably more
> accurately captured as:
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

(Technically, https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by
says that "every Co-developed-by: must be immediately followed by a
Signed-off-by: of the associated co-author" (and has an example of how
that should look).)