Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: tcpm: Fix if vbus before cc, hard_reset_count not reset issue

From: Greg KH
Date: Fri Oct 02 2020 - 09:31:49 EST

Next message: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [DISCUSSION PATCH 00/41] random: possible ways towards NIST SP800-90B compliance"
Previous message: Takashi Iwai: "Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda/realtek - Add mute Led support for HP Elitebook 845 G7"
Next in thread: Guenter Roeck: "Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: tcpm: Fix if vbus before cc, hard_reset_count not reset issue"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:07:18AM +0800, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
> Hi, Guenter:
>
> ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@xxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年9月6日週日下午11:22寫道：
> >
> > Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年9月5日週六下午11:51寫道：
> > >
> > > On 9/4/20 6:24 PM, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
> > > > Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年9月5日週六上午3:41寫道：
> > > >>
> > > >> On 9/3/20 9:21 AM, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
> > > >>> Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年9月3日週四上午12:57寫道：
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 11:35:33PM +0800, cy_huang wrote:
> > > >>>>> From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Fix: If vbus event is before cc_event trigger, hard_reset_count
> > > >>>>> won't bt reset for some case.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >>>>> ---
> > > >>>>> Below's the flow.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> _tcpm_pd_vbus_off() -> run_state_machine to change state to SNK_UNATTACHED
> > > >>>>> call tcpm_snk_detach() -> tcpm_snk_detach() -> tcpm_detach()
> > > >>>>> tcpm_port_is_disconnected() will be called.
> > > >>>>> But port->attached is still true and port->cc1=open and port->cc2=open
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> It cause tcpm_port_is_disconnected return false, then hard_reset_count won't be reset.
> > > >>>>> After that, tcpm_reset_port() is called.
> > > >>>>> port->attached become false.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> After that, cc now trigger cc_change event, the hard_reset_count will be kept.
> > > >>>>> Even tcpm_detach will be called, due to port->attached is false, tcpm_detach()
> > > >>>>> will directly return.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> CC_EVENT will only trigger drp toggling again.
> > > >>>>> ---
> > > >>>>> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 3 +--
> > > >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > > >>>>> index a48e3f90..5c73e1d 100644
> > > >>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > > >>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > > >>>>> @@ -2797,8 +2797,7 @@ static void tcpm_detach(struct tcpm_port *port)
> > > >>>>> port->tcpc->set_bist_data(port->tcpc, false);
> > > >>>>> }
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> - if (tcpm_port_is_disconnected(port))
> > > >>>>> - port->hard_reset_count = 0;
> > > >>>>> + port->hard_reset_count = 0;
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Doesn't that mean that the state machine will never enter
> > > >>>> error recovery ?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>> I think it does't affect the error recovery.
> > > >>> All error recovery seems to check pd_capable flag.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> >From my below case, it's A to C cable only. There is no USBPD contract
> > > >>> will be estabilished.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This case occurred following by the below test condition
> > > >>> Cable -> A to C (default Rp bind to vbus) connected to PC.
> > > >>> 1. first time plugged in the cable with PC
> > > >>> It will make HARD_RESET_COUNT to be equal 2
> > > >>> 2. And then plug out. At that time HARD_RESET_COUNT is till 2.
> > > >>> 3. next time plugged in again.
> > > >>> Due to hard_reset_count is still 2 , after wait_cap_timeout, the state
> > > >>> eventually changed to SNK_READY.
> > > >>> But during the state transition, no hard_reset be sent.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Defined in the USBPD policy engine, typec transition to USBPD, all
> > > >>> variables must be reset included hard_reset_count.
> > > >>> So it expected SNK must send hard_reset again.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The original code defined hard_reset_count must be reset only when
> > > >>> tcpm_port_is_disconnected.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> It doesn't make sense that it only occurred in some scenario.
> > > >>> If tcpm_detach is called, hard_reset count must be reset also.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> If a hard reset fails, the state machine may cycle through states
> > > >> HARD_RESET_SEND, HARD_RESET_START, SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_OFF,
> > > >> SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_ON back to SRC_UNATTACHED. In this state,
> > > >> tcpm_src_detach() and with it tcpm_detach() is called. The hard
> > > >> reset counter is incremented in HARD_RESET_SEND. If tcpm_detach()
> > > >> resets the counter, the state machine will keep cycling through hard
> > > >> resets without ever entering the error recovery state. I am not
> > > >> entirely sure where the counter should be reset, but tcpm_detach()
> > > >> seems to be the wrong place.
> > > >
> > > > This case you specified means locally error occurred.
> > >
> > > It could be a local error (with the local hardware), or with the
> > > remote partner not accepting the reset. We only know that an error
> > > occurred.
> > >
> > > > It intended to re-run the state machine from typec to USBPD.
> > > >>From my understanding, hard_reset_count to be reset is reasonable.
> > > >
> > > > The normal stare from the state transition you specified is
> > > > HARD_RESET_SEND, HARD_RESET_START -> SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_OFF,
> > > > SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_ON -> received VBUS_EVENT then go to SRC_STARTUP.
> > > >
> > > The operational word is "normal". Error recovery is expected to handle
> > > situations which are not normal.
> >
> > Following by the USBPD 3.0 revision 1.2, section 8.3.3.24.1
> > The ErrorRecovery state is used to electronically disconnect Port
> > Partner using the USB Type-C connector.
> > And there's one sentence to be said "The ErrorRecovery staste shall
> > map to USB Type-C Error Recovery state operations".
> > I also read ErrorRecovery state in USB TYPE-C 1.3 spec.
> > Section 4.5.2.2.2.1 ErrorRecovery state requirement listed the below text.
> > The port shall not drive VBUS or VCONN, and shall present a
> > high-impedance to ground (above
> > zOPEN) on its CC1 and CC2 pins.
> > Section 4.5.2.2.2.2 Exiting from the error recovery state
> > I read the description. The roughly meaning is to change the state to
> > Unattached(Src or Snk) after tErrorRecovery.
> >
> > Summary the above text.
> > Reset HardResetCounter is ok in tcpm_detach.
> > My patch is just to relax the counter reset conditions during tcpm_detach().
> > If not, it will check tcpm_port_is_disconnected().
> > And only two scenario, the hard reset count will be cleared to 0 at this case.
> > 1) port not attached and cc1=open and cc2=open
> > 2) port attached and either (polarity=cc1, cc1=open) or (polarity=cc2, cc2=open)
> >
> > I think this judgement is narrow in tcpm_detach case.
> >
> > >
> > > I don't question the need to reset the counter. The only question
> > > is where and when to reset it.
> > >
> > I re-check all tcpm code for hard reset counter about the increment and reset.
> > They all meets USBPD spec. Only the detach case, I'm wondering why it
> > need to add the check for tcpm_port_is_disconnected().
> >
> Below's the real case log.
> [ 4848.046358] VBUS off
> [ 4848.046384] state change SNK_READY -> SNK_UNATTACHED
> [ 4848.050908] Setting voltage/current limit 0 mV 0 mA
> [ 4848.050936] polarity 0
> [ 4848.052593] Requesting mux state 0, usb-role 0, orientation 0
> [ 4848.053222] Start toggling
> [ 4848.086500] state change SNK_UNATTACHED -> TOGGLING
> [ 4848.089983] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 3 -> 3 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, connected]
> [ 4848.089993] state change TOGGLING -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT
> [ 4848.090031] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_DEBOUNCED @ 200 ms
> [ 4848.141162] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 3 -> 0 [state SNK_ATTACH_WAIT,
> polarity 0, disconnected]
> [ 4848.141170] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT
> [ 4848.141184] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_UNATTACHED @ 20 ms
> [ 4848.163156] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_UNATTACHED [delayed 20 ms]
> [ 4848.163162] Start toggling
> [ 4848.216918] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 0 -> 3 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, connected]
> [ 4848.216954] state change TOGGLING -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT
> [ 4848.217080] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_DEBOUNCED @ 200 ms
> [ 4848.231771] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 3 -> 0 [state SNK_ATTACH_WAIT,
> polarity 0, disconnected]
> [ 4848.231800] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT
> [ 4848.231857] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_UNATTACHED @ 20 ms
> [ 4848.256022] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_UNATTACHED [delayed 20 ms]
> [ 4848.256049] Start toggling
> [ 4848.871148] VBUS on
> [ 4848.885324] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 0 -> 3 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, connected]
> [ 4848.885372] state change TOGGLING -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT
> [ 4848.885548] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_DEBOUNCED @ 200 ms
> [ 4849.088240] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_DEBOUNCED [delayed 200 ms]
> [ 4849.088284] state change SNK_DEBOUNCED -> SNK_ATTACHED
> [ 4849.088291] polarity 1
> [ 4849.088769] Requesting mux state 1, usb-role 2, orientation 2
> [ 4849.088895] state change SNK_ATTACHED -> SNK_STARTUP
> [ 4849.088907] state change SNK_STARTUP -> SNK_DISCOVERY
> [ 4849.088915] Setting voltage/current limit 5000 mV 0 mA
> [ 4849.088927] vbus=0 charge:=1
> [ 4849.090505] state change SNK_DISCOVERY -> SNK_WAIT_CAPABILITIES
> [ 4849.090828] pending state change SNK_WAIT_CAPABILITIES -> SNK_READY @ 240 ms
> [ 4849.335878] state change SNK_WAIT_CAPABILITIES -> SNK_READY [delayed 240 ms]
>
> You can see the next type c attach log.
> It directly change state from SNK_WAIT_CAPABILITIES to SNK_READY due
> to not reset hard_reset_count.
>
> It's easy to reproduce if you plugout USB Adapater w/i AtoC cable connected.

What ever happened with this patch, is there still disagreement?

thanks,

greg k-h

Next message: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [DISCUSSION PATCH 00/41] random: possible ways towards NIST SP800-90B compliance"
Previous message: Takashi Iwai: "Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda/realtek - Add mute Led support for HP Elitebook 845 G7"
Next in thread: Guenter Roeck: "Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: tcpm: Fix if vbus before cc, hard_reset_count not reset issue"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]