Re: [RESEND PATCH] spmi: prefix spmi bus device names with "spmi"

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Mark Brown (2020-10-02 11:04:30)
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 10:48:32AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Mark Brown (2020-10-02 09:03:24)
> 
> > > ...and doing this in the dev_name() should help other diagnostic users
> > > (like dev_printk() for example).
> 
> > Don't thinks like dev_printk() prefix the bus name? See
> > dev_driver_string()? So I agree that having the bus name is useful, but
> > confused why there are testing scripts and things on top of regmap
> > debugfs
> 
> Not that I've ever noticed, eg on the console.

I see things like this on my console:

[    1.684617] spmi spmi-0: PMIC arbiter version v5 (0x50000000)

and 'spmi' is the bus name I'm thinking about. But I think that's
because there isn't a driver attached. Nothing prints for the 0-00
device by default, so I enabled the debug print for it and I see

[    1.693280] pmic-spmi 0-00: 28: unknown v2.0

Anyway, the device name was written to follow i2c as far as I can tell.

If scripts, i.e. computers, have a hard time figuring out the name of
the device then fix the script?