Re: [PATCH v39 00/24] Intel SGX foundations

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 04:32:46PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> I might be late to the game, but why are you trying to dual-license the
> new files you are adding in this patch?  How will that help anyone?
> 
> I have had many talks with Intel about this in the past, and last I
> heard was that when dual-licensing made sense, they would be explicit as
> to why it was happening.  Or is my memory failing me?

My true and honest answer is that I cannot recall. Not sure even if it
was like when the driver was still out-of-tree implementation. This
would back to 2016 :-)

But we don't need to dig the exact answr because

➜  linux-tpmdd (next) ✔ git --no-pager grep -e BSD --and \( -e SPDX \)  -- "arch/*.[Sc]"
arch/arm64/lib/tishift.S:/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause)

Oh darn, I guess this implies that my hands are tied :-) I'll gladly
implement the change.

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Thank you.

/Jarkko