Re: [PATCH v4] staging: qlge: fix build breakage with dumping enabled

[Benjamin Poirier]

On 2020-10-04 23:22 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 02:53:48PM +0900, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> > On 2020-10-03 07:59 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> > > This fixes commit 0107635e15ac
> > > ("staging: qlge: replace pr_err with netdev_err") which introduced an
> > > build breakage of missing `struct ql_adapter *qdev` for some functions
> > > and a warning of type mismatch with dumping enabled, i.e.,
> > > 
> > > $ make CFLAGS_MODULE="-DQL_ALL_DUMP -DQL_OB_DUMP -DQL_CB_DUMP \
> > >     -DQL_IB_DUMP -DQL_REG_DUMP -DQL_DEV_DUMP" M=drivers/staging/qlge
> > > 
> > > qlge_dbg.c: In function ‘ql_dump_ob_mac_rsp’:
> > > qlge_dbg.c:2051:13: error: ‘qdev’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘cdev’?
> > >  2051 |  netdev_err(qdev->ndev, "%s\n", __func__);
> > >       |             ^~~~
> > > qlge_dbg.c: In function ‘ql_dump_routing_entries’:
> > > qlge_dbg.c:1435:10: warning: format ‘%s’ expects argument of type ‘char *’, but argument 3 has type ‘int’ [-Wformat=]
> > >  1435 |        "%s: Routing Mask %d = 0x%.08x\n",
> > >       |         ~^
> > >       |          |
> > >       |          char *
> > >       |         %d
> > >  1436 |        i, value);
> > >       |        ~
> > >       |        |
> > >       |        int
> > > qlge_dbg.c:1435:37: warning: format ‘%x’ expects a matching ‘unsigned int’ argument [-Wformat=]
> > >  1435 |        "%s: Routing Mask %d = 0x%.08x\n",
> > >       |                                 ~~~~^
> > >       |                                     |
> > >       |                                     unsigned int
> > > 
> > > Note that now ql_dump_rx_ring/ql_dump_tx_ring won't check if the passed
> > > parameter is a null pointer.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 0107635e15ac ("staging: qlge: replace pr_err with netdev_err")
> > > Reported-by: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Suggested-by: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thank you! Btw, I guess when this patch is picked, the "Reviewed-by" tag
> will also be included. So I needn't to send another patch, am I right?

I think so. Maintainers usually take care of adding attribution tags
from followup emails and that's what Greg has done for your previous
qlge patch it looks like.