You don't want either/or. You want both. At the time Srinivas didn'tThat makes sense, thanks Doug.
see the point of having the SoC-specific compatible string here, but
now that we have a reason for it maybe he'll be convinced? IMO you
essentially want:
items:
- enum:
- qcom,apq8064-qfprom
- qcom,apq8084-qfprom
- qcom,msm8974-qfprom
- qcom,msm8916-qfprom
- qcom,msm8996-qfprom
- qcom,msm8998-qfprom
- qcom,qcs404-qfprom
- qcom,sc7180-qfprom
- qcom,sdm845-qfprom
- const: qcom,qfprom
For some context:
<https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAD=FV=WjvAWVmq3fTh=_f2p1Dv+sXg1RV-CqZr8KRgHe8_wT0w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/>
Srini, do you want me to go fix up all the various device trees to add
the soc-compatible string, or just sc7180? (Also, don't forget about
my other question about whether you still want the keepout stuff in
the core at the cost of added complexity).
-Evan