Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rework tegra_smmu_probe_device()

[Thierry Reding]

On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:36:55PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 05.10.2020 12:53, Thierry Reding пишет:
> > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 05:50:08PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> 02.10.2020 17:22, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> >>>>  static int tegra_smmu_of_xlate(struct device *dev,
> >>>>  			       struct of_phandle_args *args)
> >>>>  {
> >>>> +	struct platform_device *iommu_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(args->np);
> >>>> +	struct tegra_mc *mc = platform_get_drvdata(iommu_pdev);
> >>>>  	u32 id = args->args[0];
> >>>>  
> >>>> +	of_node_put(args->np);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	if (!mc || !mc->smmu)
> >>>> +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >>> platform_get_drvdata(NULL) will crash.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Actually, platform_get_drvdata(NULL) can't happen. I overlooked this.
> > 
> > How so? It's technically possible for the iommus property to reference a
> > device tree node for which no platform device will ever be created, in
> > which case of_find_device_by_node() will return NULL. That's very
> > unlikely and perhaps worth just crashing on to make sure it gets fixed
> > immediately.
> 
> The tegra_smmu_ops are registered from the SMMU driver itself and MC
> driver sets platform data before SMMU is initialized, hence device is
> guaranteed to exist and mc can't be NULL.

Yes, but that assumes that args->np points to the memory controller's
device tree node. It's obviously a mistake to do this, but I don't think
anyone will prevent you from doing this:

	iommus = <&{/chosen} 0>;

In that case, since no platform device is created for the /chosen node,
iommu_pdev will end up being NULL and platform_get_drvdata() will crash.

That said, I'm fine with not adding a check for that. If anyone really
does end up messing this up they deserve the crash.

I'm still a bit undecided about the mc->smmu check because I haven't
convinced myself yet that it can't happen.

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature