Re: linux tooling mailing list

[Sedat Dilek]

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:50 PM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 10:37 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/2/20 10:22 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 02:01:13PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 12:26 AM David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>> From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:29:38 -0700
> > >>>> linux-toolchains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>
> > >>> Created.
> > >>
> > >> I am subscribed, too.
> > >>
> > >> Will there be a(n)...?
> > >>
> > >> * archive (for example marc.info)
> > >
> > > A lore archive would be good?
> >
> > That has already been requested.
>
> Hi David,
> Thank you for setting up the mailing list.  I appreciate it.  Now that
> the lore archive has been set up
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-toolchains/), would you mind linking to
> it from http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html under archives of
> linux-toolchains?
>

Updating MAINTAINERS file came to my mind... Dunno where ro place the
new ML info?

- Sedat -

> >
> > >
> > >> * patchwork url
> > >
> > > We do not have any repositories associated with this list, and there
> > > won't be many patches anyway, so patchwork will only be useful as a kind
> > > of mail archive.  I can ask to set one up though, if people want that?
>
> Personally, I haven't been using patchwork.  I know some maintainers
> use it to keep track of reviews of lots of patches, but other than
> that is there a major use case for patchwork I'm missing?
>
> > >
> > >
> > > Segher
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ~Randy
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers