RE: Control Dependencies vs C Compilers

[David Laight]

>   My suggestion as an alternative is to use assembler instead.
>   That way you can guarantee that you get the instructions you
>   want in the order that you want them.  It should be fairly
>   straightforward to create a macro or inline function that
>   contains the necessary code and this can be done once and
>   then used wherever the functionality is required.

C exists because K&R got fed up of writing pdp-11 assembler.
Compared to some modern ones it is nice and easy to write
(I'm old enough to have used pdp-11.)

You can't put control dependencies inside C asm statements.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)