Re: [PATCH RFC] script: add a script for checking doc problems with external functions
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Date: Wed Oct 07 2020 - 09:39:05 EST
Em Wed, 07 Oct 2020 01:32:31 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 11:23 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Oct 2020, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > While not all EXPORT_SYMBOL*() symbols should be documented,
> > > it seems useful to have a tool which would help to check what
> > > symbols aren't documented.
> > >
> > > This is a first step on this direction. The tool has some
> > > limitations. Yet, it could be useful for maintainers to check
> > > about missing documents on their subsystems.
> >
> > Seems like this should be part of checkpatch.pl somehow.
>
> I don't see how.
Just sent a third version of the script. It should now be able to check
if the RST files have the exported symbols as well:
<snip>
$ scripts/check_docs_external_symbols lib/debugobjects.c
lib/debugobjects.c: export symbol debug_object_active_state not documented at: Documentation/core-api/debug-objects.rst
</snip>
It also checks if an exported symbol has duplicated entries at
kernel-doc as well.
The check logic for it is somewhat complex. so, I won't doubt that
there are some other hidden bugs.
Also, as right now, the script is slow, if one wants to run it
for the entire Kernel.
Thanks,
Mauro