Re: [PATCH 02/12] samples: configfs: order includes alphabetically

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:45:16PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The preferred coding style is to order all includes alphabetically for
> improved readability. There's no need for the configfs header to come
> last.

Is it?  People seem to have all kinds of weird opinions, but I don't
think any ordering really makes sense.  What does make sense it dropping
the pointless empty line, so I've folded that into the next patch.