Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] counters: Introduce counter_atomic* counters
From: Kees Cook
Date: Fri Oct 09 2020 - 14:01:00 EST
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:55:56AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Introduce Simple atomic counters.
>
> There are a number of atomic_t usages in the kernel where atomic_t api
> is used strictly for counting and not for managing object lifetime. In
> some cases, atomic_t might not even be needed.
>
> The purpose of these counters is to clearly differentiate atomic_t
> counters from atomic_t usages that guard object lifetimes, hence prone
> to overflow and underflow errors. It allows tools that scan for underflow
> and overflow on atomic_t usages to detect overflow and underflows to scan
> just the cases that are prone to errors.
>
> Simple atomic counters api provides interfaces for simple atomic counters
> that just count, and don't guard resource lifetimes. The interfaces are
> built on top of atomic_t api, providing a smaller subset of atomic_t
> interfaces necessary to support simple counters.
>
> Counter wraps around to INT_MIN when it overflows and should not be used
> to guard resource lifetimes, device usage and open counts that control
> state changes, and pm states. Overflowing to INT_MIN is consistent with
> the atomic_t api, which it is built on top of.
>
> Using counter_atomic* to guard lifetimes could lead to use-after free
> when it overflows and undefined behavior when used to manage state
> changes and device usage/open states.
>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Kees Cook