[PATCH v2 17/22] drm/msm: Drop struct_mutex from the retire path

[Rob Clark]

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Now that we are not relying on dev->struct_mutex to protect the
ring->submits lists, drop the struct_mutex lock.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c | 8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c
index 8278a4df331a..a754e84b8b5d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ static void retire_submit(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_ringbuffer *ring,
 
 		msm_gem_active_put(&msm_obj->base);
 		msm_gem_unpin_iova(&msm_obj->base, submit->aspace);
-		drm_gem_object_put_locked(&msm_obj->base);
+		drm_gem_object_put(&msm_obj->base);
 	}
 
 	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&gpu->pdev->dev);
@@ -722,11 +722,8 @@ static void retire_submit(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_ringbuffer *ring,
 
 static void retire_submits(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 {
-	struct drm_device *dev = gpu->dev;
 	int i;
 
-	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev->struct_mutex));
-
 	/* Retire the commits starting with highest priority */
 	for (i = 0; i < gpu->nr_rings; i++) {
 		struct msm_ringbuffer *ring = gpu->rb[i];
@@ -756,15 +753,12 @@ static void retire_submits(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 static void retire_worker(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct msm_gpu *gpu = container_of(work, struct msm_gpu, retire_work);
-	struct drm_device *dev = gpu->dev;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < gpu->nr_rings; i++)
 		update_fences(gpu, gpu->rb[i], gpu->rb[i]->memptrs->fence);
 
-	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 	retire_submits(gpu);
-	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 }
 
 /* call from irq handler to schedule work to retire bo's */
-- 
2.26.2