Re: [PATCH 12/13] timekeeping: default GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS to enabled

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Mon Oct 12 2020 - 09:16:21 EST


On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:48 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Almost all machines use GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS, so it feels wrong to
> require each one to select that symbol manually.
>
> Instead, enable it whenever CONFIG_LEGACY_TIMER_TICK is disabled as
> a simplification. It should be possible to select both
> GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS and LEGACY_TIMER_TICK from an architecture now
> and decide at runtime between the two.
>
> For the clockevents arch-support.txt file, this means that additional
> architectures are marked as TODO when they have at least one machine
> that still uses LEGACY_TIMER_TICK, rather than being marked 'ok' when
> at least one machine has been converted. This means that both m68k and
> arm (for riscpc) revert to TODO.
>
> At this point, we could just always enable CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> rather than leaving it off when not needed. I built an m68k
> defconfig kernel (using gcc-10.1.0) and found that this would add
> around 5.5KB in kernel image size:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 3861936 1092236 196656 5150828 4e986c obj-m68k/vmlinux-no-clockevent
> 3866201 1093832 196184 5156217 4ead79 obj-m68k/vmlinux-clockevent
>
> On Arm (MACH_RPC), that difference appears to be twice as large,
> around 11KB on top of an 6MB vmlinux.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu | 1 -

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds