Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git

From: Zamir SUN
Date: Mon Oct 12 2020 - 23:06:30 EST


On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:17 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> [ Removing the powertop mailing list because it's rejecting everything ]
>
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:41:20 -0700
> Tony Jones <tonyj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:19:50AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > Once it's shown that it works for all the package maintainers, I will tag
> > > it which should create the tarballs automatically on the above link.
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > It builds fine for me after manually creating the tarball from git.
> > Once there is an official versioned tarball I'll push it into
> > openSUSE.
> >
> > I presume some perf Makefile changes will be forthcoming to use it,
> > rather than continuing to force build it out of TRACE_EVENT_DIR
> >
>
> Zamir found this issue with the Documentation man pages:
>
> Note, I'm not sure the proper way to fix this. I think this is the last
> issue I need to resolve before making the tag.
>

If anyone interested in, the discussion of this document compiling is
in the thread "libtraceevent: make doc-install tries different file
names than generated".

With the patch Steve mentioned, I can package this in RPM already. And
it's pending review in Fedora now.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887470

So, for me, there is no more issue for Fedora packaging.

Thanks.