Re: [PATCH v2 04/24] docs: lockdep-design: fix some warning issues

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 02:14:31PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> +   =====  ===================================================
> +   ``.``  acquired while irqs disabled and not in irq context
> +   ``-``  acquired in irq context
> +   ``+``  acquired with irqs enabled
> +   ``?``  acquired in irq context with irqs enabled.
> +   =====  ===================================================
>  
>  The bits are illustrated with an example::
>  
> @@ -96,14 +99,14 @@ exact case is for the lock as of the reporting time.
>    +--------------+-------------+--------------+
>    |              | irq enabled | irq disabled |
>    +--------------+-------------+--------------+
> -  | ever in irq  |      ?      |       -      |
> +  | ever in irq  |    ``?``    |     ``-``    |
>    +--------------+-------------+--------------+
> -  | never in irq |      +      |       .      |
> +  | never in irq |    ``+``    |     ``.``    |
>    +--------------+-------------+--------------+
>  
> -The character '-' suggests irq is disabled because if otherwise the
> -charactor '?' would have been shown instead. Similar deduction can be
> -applied for '+' too.
> +The character ``-`` suggests irq is disabled because if otherwise the
> +charactor ``?`` would have been shown instead. Similar deduction can be
> +applied for ``+`` too.
>  

NAK!