Re: [PATCH] lib: kunit: add test_min_heap test conversion to KUnit

From: Vitor Massaru Iha
Date: Wed Oct 14 2020 - 22:19:48 EST

Next message: Peng Fan: "RE: [PATCH 09/13] remoteproc: Add return value to function rproc_shutdown()"
Previous message: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH v6 07/25] treewide: remove DISABLE_LTO"
In reply to: Vitor Massaru Iha: "Re: [PATCH] lib: kunit: add test_min_heap test conversion to KUnit"
Next in thread: Ian Rogers: "Re: [PATCH] lib: kunit: add test_min_heap test conversion to KUnit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Ian,

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:57 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 1:11 PM Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This adds the conversion of the runtime tests of test_min_heap,
> > from `lib/test_min_heap.c` to KUnit tests.
> >
> > Please apply this commit first (linux-kselftest/kunit-fixes):
> > 3f37d14b8a3152441f36b6bc74000996679f0998 kunit: kunit_config: Fix parsing of CONFIG options with space
>
> Thanks for this, I'm a fan of testing frameworks :-)
>
> > Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > lib/Kconfig.debug | 29 ++++--
> > lib/Makefile | 2 +-
> > lib/{test_min_heap.c => min_heap_kunit.c} | 117 ++++++++++++----------
> > 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> > rename lib/{test_min_heap.c => min_heap_kunit.c} (60%)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > index 9ad9210d70a1..46674fc4972c 100644
> > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -1864,16 +1864,6 @@ config TEST_LIST_SORT
> >
> > If unsure, say N.
> >
> > -config TEST_MIN_HEAP
> > - tristate "Min heap test"
> > - depends on DEBUG_KERNEL || m
> > - help
> > - Enable this to turn on min heap function tests. This test is
> > - executed only once during system boot (so affects only boot time),
> > - or at module load time.
> > -
> > - If unsure, say N.
> > -
> > config TEST_SORT
> > tristate "Array-based sort test"
> > depends on DEBUG_KERNEL || m
> > @@ -2185,6 +2175,25 @@ config LINEAR_RANGES_TEST
> >
> > If unsure, say N.
> >
> > +config MIN_HEAP_KUNIT
> > + tristate "KUnit test for Min heap"
> > + depends on KUNIT
> > + depends on DEBUG_KERNEL || m
> > + help
> > + Enable this to turn on min heap function tests. This test is
> > + executed only once during system boot (so affects only boot time),
> > + or at module load time.
> > +
> > + KUnit tests run during boot and output the results to the debug log
> > + in TAP format (http://testanything.org/). Only useful for kernel devs
> > + running the KUnit test harness, and not intended for inclusion into a
> > + production build.
> > +
> > + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer
> > + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
> > +
> > + If unsure, say N.
> > +
>
> It's a shame we need a config option for this. Could we have one
> option to cover all basic library tests?
>
> > config TEST_UDELAY
> > tristate "udelay test driver"
> > help
> > diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
> > index b1c42c10073b..748f57063160 100644
> > --- a/lib/Makefile
> > +++ b/lib/Makefile
> > @@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ CFLAGS_test_ubsan.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, vla)
> > UBSAN_SANITIZE_test_ubsan.o := y
> > obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_KSTRTOX) += test-kstrtox.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT) += test_list_sort.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_MIN_HEAP) += test_min_heap.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_LKM) += test_module.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC) += test_vmalloc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_OVERFLOW) += test_overflow.o
> > @@ -318,3 +317,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OBJAGG) += objagg.o
> > # KUnit tests
> > obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list-test.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) += test_linear_ranges.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_MIN_HEAP_KUNIT) += min_heap_kunit.o
> > diff --git a/lib/test_min_heap.c b/lib/min_heap_kunit.c
> > similarity index 60%
> > rename from lib/test_min_heap.c
> > rename to lib/min_heap_kunit.c
> > index d19c8080fd4d..398db1c63146 100644
> > --- a/lib/test_min_heap.c
> > +++ b/lib/min_heap_kunit.c
> > @@ -7,9 +7,8 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/log2.h>
> > #include <linux/min_heap.h>
> > -#include <linux/module.h>
> > -#include <linux/printk.h>
> > #include <linux/random.h>
> > +#include <kunit/test.h>
> >
> > static __init bool less_than(const void *lhs, const void *rhs)
> > {
> > @@ -29,37 +28,34 @@ static __init void swap_ints(void *lhs, void *rhs)
> > *(int *)rhs = temp;
> > }
> >
> > -static __init int pop_verify_heap(bool min_heap,
> > +static __init void pop_verify_heap(struct kunit *context,
> > + bool min_heap,
> > struct min_heap *heap,
> > const struct min_heap_callbacks *funcs)
> > {
> > int *values = heap->data;
> > - int err = 0;
> > int last;
> >
> > last = values[0];
> > min_heap_pop(heap, funcs);
> > while (heap->nr > 0) {
> > if (min_heap) {
> > - if (last > values[0]) {
> > - pr_err("error: expected %d <= %d\n", last,
> > - values[0]);
> > - err++;
> > - }
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE_MSG(context,
> > + last > values[0],
> > + "expected %d <= %d\n",
> > + last, values[0]);
>
> I'm not familiar with kunit, is there a reason not to prefer:
> KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(context, last, values[0]);
>
> > } else {
> > - if (last < values[0]) {
> > - pr_err("error: expected %d >= %d\n", last,
> > - values[0]);
> > - err++;
> > - }
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE_MSG(context,
> > + last < values[0],
> > + "expected %d >= %d\n",
> > + last, values[0]);
>
> Similarly KUNIT_EXPECT_GT.

In relation to this, instead of KUNIT_EXPECT_LT, we would have to have
something like KUNIT_EXPECT_LT_FALSE.
Otherwise the test will always fail.

>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> > }
> > last = values[0];
> > min_heap_pop(heap, funcs);
> > }
> > - return err;
> > }
> >
> > -static __init int test_heapify_all(bool min_heap)
> > +static __init void test_heapify_all(struct kunit *context, bool min_heap)
> > {
> > int values[] = { 3, 1, 2, 4, 0x8000000, 0x7FFFFFF, 0,
> > -3, -1, -2, -4, 0x8000000, 0x7FFFFFF };
> > @@ -73,12 +69,11 @@ static __init int test_heapify_all(bool min_heap)
> > .less = min_heap ? less_than : greater_than,
> > .swp = swap_ints,
> > };
> > - int i, err;
> > + int i;
> >
> > /* Test with known set of values. */
> > min_heapify_all(&heap, &funcs);
> > - err = pop_verify_heap(min_heap, &heap, &funcs);
> > -
> > + pop_verify_heap(context, min_heap, &heap, &funcs);
> >
> > /* Test with randomly generated values. */
> > heap.nr = ARRAY_SIZE(values);
> > @@ -86,12 +81,10 @@ static __init int test_heapify_all(bool min_heap)
> > values[i] = get_random_int();
> >
> > min_heapify_all(&heap, &funcs);
> > - err += pop_verify_heap(min_heap, &heap, &funcs);
> > -
> > - return err;
> > + pop_verify_heap(context, min_heap, &heap, &funcs);
> > }
> >
> > -static __init int test_heap_push(bool min_heap)
> > +static __init void test_heap_push(struct kunit *context, bool min_heap)
> > {
> > const int data[] = { 3, 1, 2, 4, 0x80000000, 0x7FFFFFFF, 0,
> > -3, -1, -2, -4, 0x80000000, 0x7FFFFFFF };
> > @@ -106,25 +99,22 @@ static __init int test_heap_push(bool min_heap)
> > .less = min_heap ? less_than : greater_than,
> > .swp = swap_ints,
> > };
> > - int i, temp, err;
> > + int i, temp;
> >
> > /* Test with known set of values copied from data. */
> > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data); i++)
> > min_heap_push(&heap, &data[i], &funcs);
> > -
> > - err = pop_verify_heap(min_heap, &heap, &funcs);
> > + pop_verify_heap(context, min_heap, &heap, &funcs);
> >
> > /* Test with randomly generated values. */
> > while (heap.nr < heap.size) {
> > temp = get_random_int();
> > min_heap_push(&heap, &temp, &funcs);
> > }
> > - err += pop_verify_heap(min_heap, &heap, &funcs);
> > -
> > - return err;
> > + pop_verify_heap(context, min_heap, &heap, &funcs);
> > }
> >
> > -static __init int test_heap_pop_push(bool min_heap)
> > +static __init void test_heap_pop_push(struct kunit *context, bool min_heap)
> > {
> > const int data[] = { 3, 1, 2, 4, 0x80000000, 0x7FFFFFFF, 0,
> > -3, -1, -2, -4, 0x80000000, 0x7FFFFFFF };
> > @@ -139,7 +129,7 @@ static __init int test_heap_pop_push(bool min_heap)
> > .less = min_heap ? less_than : greater_than,
> > .swp = swap_ints,
> > };
> > - int i, temp, err;
> > + int i, temp;
> >
> > /* Fill values with data to pop and replace. */
> > temp = min_heap ? 0x80000000 : 0x7FFFFFFF;
> > @@ -149,8 +139,7 @@ static __init int test_heap_pop_push(bool min_heap)
> > /* Test with known set of values copied from data. */
> > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data); i++)
> > min_heap_pop_push(&heap, &data[i], &funcs);
> > -
> > - err = pop_verify_heap(min_heap, &heap, &funcs);
> > + pop_verify_heap(context, min_heap, &heap, &funcs);
> >
> > heap.nr = 0;
> > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data); i++)
> > @@ -161,34 +150,54 @@ static __init int test_heap_pop_push(bool min_heap)
> > temp = get_random_int();
> > min_heap_pop_push(&heap, &temp, &funcs);
> > }
> > - err += pop_verify_heap(min_heap, &heap, &funcs);
> > + pop_verify_heap(context, min_heap, &heap, &funcs);
> > +}
> >
> > - return err;
> > +static void __init test_heapify_all_true(struct kunit *context)
> > +{
> > + test_heapify_all(context, true);
> > }
> >
> > -static int __init test_min_heap_init(void)
> > +static void __init test_heapify_all_false(struct kunit *context)
> > {
> > - int err = 0;
> > -
> > - err += test_heapify_all(true);
> > - err += test_heapify_all(false);
> > - err += test_heap_push(true);
> > - err += test_heap_push(false);
> > - err += test_heap_pop_push(true);
> > - err += test_heap_pop_push(false);
> > - if (err) {
> > - pr_err("test failed with %d errors\n", err);
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > - pr_info("test passed\n");
> > - return 0;
> > + test_heapify_all(context, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __init test_heap_push_true(struct kunit *context)
> > +{
> > + test_heap_push(context, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __init test_heap_push_false(struct kunit *context)
> > +{
> > + test_heap_push(context, false);
> > }
> > -module_init(test_min_heap_init);
> >
> > -static void __exit test_min_heap_exit(void)
> > +static void __init test_heap_pop_push_true(struct kunit *context)
> > {
> > - /* do nothing */
> > + test_heap_pop_push(context, true);
> > }
> > -module_exit(test_min_heap_exit);
> > +
> > +static void __init test_heap_pop_push_false(struct kunit *context)
> > +{
> > + test_heap_pop_push(context, false);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct kunit_case __refdata min_heap_test_cases[] = {
> > + KUNIT_CASE(test_heapify_all_true),
> > + KUNIT_CASE(test_heapify_all_false),
> > + KUNIT_CASE(test_heap_push_true),
> > + KUNIT_CASE(test_heap_push_false),
> > + KUNIT_CASE(test_heap_pop_push_true),
> > + KUNIT_CASE(test_heap_pop_push_false),
> > + {}
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct kunit_suite min_heap_test_suite = {
> > + .name = "min-heap",
> > + .test_cases = min_heap_test_cases,
> > +};
> > +
> > +kunit_test_suites(&min_heap_test_suite);
> >
> > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >
> > base-commit: d43c7fb05765152d4d4a39a8ef957c4ea14d8847
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >

Next message: Peng Fan: "RE: [PATCH 09/13] remoteproc: Add return value to function rproc_shutdown()"
Previous message: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH v6 07/25] treewide: remove DISABLE_LTO"
In reply to: Vitor Massaru Iha: "Re: [PATCH] lib: kunit: add test_min_heap test conversion to KUnit"
Next in thread: Ian Rogers: "Re: [PATCH] lib: kunit: add test_min_heap test conversion to KUnit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]