Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: misc: add support for both property names cmd-gpios and cmd-gpio

From: Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Date: Thu Oct 15 2020 - 03:59:39 EST




On 2020/10/15 15:01, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Zhen,
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 6:52 AM Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The definition "gpio_suffixes[] = { "gpios", "gpio" }" shows that both
>> property names "cmd-gpios" and "cmd-gpio" are supported. But currently
>> only "cmd-gpios" is allowed in this yaml, and the name used in
>> mmp2-olpc-xo-1-75.dts is cmd-gpio. As a result, the following errors is
>> reported.
>>
>> slave: 'cmd-gpios' is a required property
>> slave: 'cmd-gpio' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/olpc,xo1.75-ec.yaml | 14 ++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/olpc,xo1.75-ec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/olpc,xo1.75-ec.yaml
>> index b3c45c046ba5e37..dd549380a085709 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/olpc,xo1.75-ec.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/olpc,xo1.75-ec.yaml
>> @@ -24,15 +24,21 @@ properties:
>> compatible:
>> const: olpc,xo1.75-ec
>>
>> - cmd-gpios:
>> + spi-cpha: true
>> +
>> +patternProperties:
>> + "^cmd-gpio[s]?$":
>> description: GPIO uspecifier of the CMD pin
>> maxItems: 1
>
> In general, the *-gpio form is deprecated. So why complicate the DT
> bindings by adding support for deprecated properties?

I just don't know this information. So this patch can be ignored.

>
> 1. Explicitly allowing deprecated properties means new users may be
> added,
> 2. Once all in-tree DTS files are converted, the warnings will be gone
> anyway,
> 3. Out-of-tree DTB will still work, as it's very unlikely support for
> the "gpio" suffix can/will be dropped anytime soon,
> 4. If anyone runs the validator on out-of-tree DTS files, the most
> probable intention is to fix any detected issues anyway, and the
> files can be updated, too,
> 5. If any out-of-tree code or tooling relies on the *-gpio form, it
> may already be broken.
>
>> - spi-cpha: true
>> -
>> required:
>> - compatible
>> - - cmd-gpios
>> +
>> +oneOf:
>> + - required:
>> + - cmd-gpio
>> + - required:
>> + - cmd-gpios
>>
>> additionalProperties: false
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>