Re: [PATCH] RCU: fix a typo in comments of rcu_blocking_is_gp

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 03:53:03AM +0000, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> There is a tiny typo in comment of function rcu_blocking_is_gp.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>

Good catch, queued, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index f78ee75..4cca03f 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -3512,7 +3512,7 @@ void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void)
>   * During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically
>   * implies a grace period.  Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPTION.
>   *
> - * Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any
> + * However, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any
>   * blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if
>   * there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of
>   * either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited().  It is OK to
> -- 
> 1.7.1
>