Re: [PATCH v39 21/24] x86/vdso: Implement a vDSO for Intel SGX enclave call
From: Jarkko Sakkinen
Date: Sat Oct 17 2020 - 17:02:24 EST
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 06:48:53PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 9:51 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > An SGX runtime must be aware of the exceptions, which happen inside an
> > enclave. Introduce a vDSO call that wraps EENTER/ERESUME cycle and returns
> > the CPU exception back to the caller exactly when it happens.
> >
> > Kernel fixups the exception information to RDI, RSI and RDX. The SGX call
> > vDSO handler fills this information to the user provided buffer or
> > alternatively trigger user provided callback at the time of the exception.
> >
> > The calling convention supports providing the parameters in standard RDI
> > RSI, RDX, RCX, R8 and R9 registers, i.e. it is possible to declare the vDSO
> > as a C prototype, but other than that there is no specific support for
> > SystemV ABI. Storing XSAVE etc. is all responsibility of the enclave and
> > the associated run-time.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Jethro Beekman <jethro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Jethro Beekman <jethro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Co-developed-by: Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Co-developed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > +SYM_FUNC_START(__vdso_sgx_enter_enclave)
> > + /* Prolog */
> > + .cfi_startproc
> > + push %rbp
> > + .cfi_adjust_cfa_offset 8
> > + .cfi_rel_offset %rbp, 0
> > + mov %rsp, %rbp
> > + .cfi_def_cfa_register %rbp
> > + push %rbx
> > + .cfi_rel_offset %rbx, -8
>
> This *looks* right, but I'm not really an expert.
I did not change this from earlier versions.
> > +
> > + mov %ecx, %eax
> > +.Lenter_enclave:
> > + /* EENTER <= leaf <= ERESUME */
> > + cmp $EENTER, %eax
> > + jb .Linvalid_input
> > + cmp $ERESUME, %eax
> > + ja .Linvalid_input
> > +
> > + mov SGX_ENCLAVE_OFFSET_OF_RUN(%rbp), %rcx
> > +
> > + /* Validate that the reserved area contains only zeros. */
> > + push %rax
> > + push %rbx
>
> This could use a .cfi_register_something_or_other for rbx
Sean pointed out that saving %rbx is not necessary here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/20201006025703.GG15803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > + mov $SGX_ENCLAVE_RUN_RESERVED_START, %rbx
> > +1:
> > + mov (%rcx, %rbx), %rax
> > + cmpq $0, %rax
> > + jne .Linvalid_input
> > +
> > + add $8, %rbx
> > + cmpq $SGX_ENCLAVE_RUN_RESERVED_END, %rbx
> > + jne 1b
> > + pop %rbx
>
> This should undo it.
Given private feedback from Sean, I'm replacing this with:
mov $SGX_ENCLAVE_RUN_RESERVED_START, %rbx
1:
cmpq $0, (%rcx, %rbx)
jne .Linvalid_input
add $8, %rbx
cmpq $SGX_ENCLAVE_RUN_RESERVED_END, %rbx
jne 1b
There was bug in the error path, %rax was not popped. I did negative
testing (testing both branches) for this but it went clean.
I guess if I fix this, that will deal with all of your comments?
> > + pop %rax
> > +
> > + /* Load TCS and AEP */
> > + mov SGX_ENCLAVE_RUN_TCS(%rcx), %rbx
> > + lea .Lasync_exit_pointer(%rip), %rcx
> > +
> > + /* Single ENCLU serving as both EENTER and AEP (ERESUME) */
> > +.Lasync_exit_pointer:
> > +.Lenclu_eenter_eresume:
> > + enclu
> > +
> > + /* EEXIT jumps here unless the enclave is doing something fancy. */
> > + mov SGX_ENCLAVE_OFFSET_OF_RUN(%rbp), %rbx
> > +
> > + /* Set exit_reason. */
> > + movl $EEXIT, SGX_ENCLAVE_RUN_LEAF(%rbx)
> > +
> > + /* Invoke userspace's exit handler if one was provided. */
> > +.Lhandle_exit:
> > + cmpq $0, SGX_ENCLAVE_RUN_USER_HANDLER(%rbx)
> > + jne .Linvoke_userspace_handler
> > +
> > + /* Success, in the sense that ENCLU was attempted. */
> > + xor %eax, %eax
> > +
> > +.Lout:
> > + pop %rbx
>
> and this should undo the .cfi_register.
>
> > + leave
> > + .cfi_def_cfa %rsp, 8
> > + ret
> > +
> > + /* The out-of-line code runs with the pre-leave stack frame. */
> > + .cfi_def_cfa %rbp, 16
> > +
> > +.Linvalid_input:
>
> Here rbx and rax are pushed, and I guess pop rbx and leave fixes that
> up, so okay.
>
> > + mov $(-EINVAL), %eax
> > + jmp .Lout
> > +
> > +.Lhandle_exception:
> > + mov SGX_ENCLAVE_OFFSET_OF_RUN(%rbp), %rbx
> > +
> > + /* Set the exception info. */
> > + mov %eax, (SGX_ENCLAVE_RUN_LEAF)(%rbx)
> > + mov %di, (SGX_ENCLAVE_RUN_EXCEPTION_VECTOR)(%rbx)
> > + mov %si, (SGX_ENCLAVE_RUN_EXCEPTION_ERROR_CODE)(%rbx)
> > + mov %rdx, (SGX_ENCLAVE_RUN_EXCEPTION_ADDR)(%rbx)
> > + jmp .Lhandle_exit
> > +
> > +.Linvoke_userspace_handler:
> > + /* Pass the untrusted RSP (at exit) to the callback via %rcx. */
> > + mov %rsp, %rcx
> > +
> > + /* Save struct sgx_enclave_exception %rbx is about to be clobbered. */
> > + mov %rbx, %rax
> > +
> > + /* Save the untrusted RSP offset in %rbx (non-volatile register). */
> > + mov %rsp, %rbx
> > + and $0xf, %rbx
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Align stack per x86_64 ABI. Note, %rsp needs to be 16-byte aligned
> > + * _after_ pushing the parameters on the stack, hence the bonus push.
> > + */
> > + and $-0x10, %rsp
> > + push %rax
> > +
> > + /* Push struct sgx_enclave_exception as a param to the callback. */
> > + push %rax
> > +
> > + /* Clear RFLAGS.DF per x86_64 ABI */
> > + cld
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Load the callback pointer to %rax and lfence for LVI (load value
> > + * injection) protection before making the call.
> > + */
> > + mov SGX_ENCLAVE_RUN_USER_HANDLER(%rax), %rax
> > + lfence
> > + call *%rax
> > +
> > + /* Undo the post-exit %rsp adjustment. */
> > + lea 0x10(%rsp, %rbx), %rsp
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If the return from callback is zero or negative, return immediately,
> > + * else re-execute ENCLU with the postive return value interpreted as
> > + * the requested ENCLU leaf.
> > + */
> > + cmp $0, %eax
> > + jle .Lout
> > + jmp .Lenter_enclave
> > +
> > + .cfi_endproc
> > +
> > +_ASM_VDSO_EXTABLE_HANDLE(.Lenclu_eenter_eresume, .Lhandle_exception)
/Jarkko