Re: [PATCH] [v2] rtc: sun6i: Fix memleak in sun6i_rtc_clk_init

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi,

On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 03:28:10PM +0800, Dinghao Liu wrote:
> When clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy() fails,
> clk_data should be freed. It's the same for the subsequent
> two error paths, but we should also unregister the already
> registered clocks in them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Changelog:
> 
> v2: - Unregister the already registered clocks on failure.
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> index e2b8b150bcb4..6de0d3ad736a 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static void __init sun6i_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node,
>  								300000000);
>  	if (IS_ERR(rtc->int_osc)) {
>  		pr_crit("Couldn't register the internal oscillator\n");
> -		return;
> +		goto err;
>  	}
>  
>  	parents[0] = clk_hw_get_name(rtc->int_osc);
> @@ -290,7 +290,8 @@ static void __init sun6i_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node,
>  	rtc->losc = clk_register(NULL, &rtc->hw);
>  	if (IS_ERR(rtc->losc)) {
>  		pr_crit("Couldn't register the LOSC clock\n");
> -		return;
> +		clk_hw_unregister_fixed_rate(rtc->int_osc);
> +		goto err;
>  	}

The point of having labels for the error sequence is to avoid to
duplicate the error handling code in each and every error code path.

You should add another label for the fixed rate clock unregistration

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature