Re: [PATCH] blk: use REQ_OP_WRITE instead of hard code

[Johannes Thumshirn]

On 19/10/2020 16:30, 苏辉 wrote:
> Yeah, you are right, thanks for your explanation<br/><br/>Maybe we should define a MASK to do this?

Why? I personally find a '& 1' way more understandable than a 
REQ_OP_IS_WRITE_MASK or sth like that. The former I can just read,
for the latter I would need to look up the definition to be able to
understand the code.