Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] tracepoints: Add helper to test if tracepoint is enabled in a header

[Vlastimil Babka]

On 9/25/20 11:12 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> As tracepoints are discouraged from being added in a header because it can
> cause side effects if other tracepoints are in headers, as well as bloat the
> kernel as the trace_<tracepoint>() function is not a small inline, the common
> workaround is to add a function call that calls a wrapper function in a
> C file that then calls the tracepoint. But as function calls add overhead,
> this function should only be called when the tracepoint in question is
> enabled. To get around this overhead, a static_branch can be used to only
> have the tracepoint wrapper get called when the tracepoint is enabled.
>
> Add a tracepoint_enabled(tp) macro that gets passed the name of the
> tracepoint, and this becomes a static_branch that is enabled when the
> tracepoint is enabled and is a nop when the tracepoint is disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Nice! I'm late here, but you mentioned a v3, so FWIW:

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>