RE: [PATCH 0/2] rtc: pcf2127: only use watchdog when explicitly available

From: Qiang Zhao
Date: Mon Oct 26 2020 - 03:23:34 EST


Any update for this patchset?

Best Regards
Qiang Zhao

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2020年9月24日 18:53
> To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Qiang Zhao
> <qiang.zhao@xxxxxxx>; Bruno Thomsen <bruno.thomsen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-rtc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; a.zummo@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Guenter Roeck
> <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] rtc: pcf2127: only use watchdog when explicitly available
>
> Hello,
>
> now that there are two people stumbling over the pcf2127 driver providing a
> non-functional watchdog device, here comes an RFC patch to address this.
>
> Note this is only compile tested and dt-documentation is still missing.
> Still send this series because the cleanup is nice independent of this discussion
> and to have something to argue about.
>
> Does someone can offer a better name than "has-watchdog", is there a scheme
> that could be used already that I'm not aware of?
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> Uwe Kleine-König (2):
> rtc: pcf2127: move watchdog initialisation to a separate function
> [RFC] rtc: pcf2127: only use watchdog when explicitly available
>
> drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.28.0