[tip: locking/urgent] lockdep: Fix preemption WARN for spurious IRQ-enable
From: tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Oct 26 2020 - 08:41:52 EST
The following commit has been merged into the locking/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: f8e48a3dca060e80f672d398d181db1298fbc86c
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/f8e48a3dca060e80f672d398d181db1298fbc86c
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:23:02 +02:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:37:22 +02:00
lockdep: Fix preemption WARN for spurious IRQ-enable
It is valid (albeit uncommon) to call local_irq_enable() without first
having called local_irq_disable(). In this case we enter
lockdep_hardirqs_on*() with IRQs enabled and trip a preemption warning
for using __this_cpu_read().
Use this_cpu_read() instead to avoid the warning.
Fixes: 4d004099a6 ("lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion")
Reported-by: syzbot+53f8ce8bbc07924b6417@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 3e99dfe..fc206ae 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -4057,7 +4057,7 @@ void lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(unsigned long ip)
if (unlikely(in_nmi()))
return;
- if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
+ if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
return;
if (unlikely(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())) {
@@ -4126,7 +4126,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigned long ip)
goto skip_checks;
}
- if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
+ if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
return;
if (lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()) {