RE: [EXT] Re: [v2 01/11] irqchip: ls-extirq: Add LS1043A, LS1088A external interrupt

[Biwen Li]

> 
> Caution: EXT Email
> 
> On 27/10/2020 05.46, Biwen Li wrote:
> > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add an new IRQ chip declaration for LS1043A and LS1088A
> > - compatible "fsl,ls1043a-extirq" for LS1043A, LS1046A. SCFG_INTPCR[31:0]
> >   of these SoCs is stored/read as SCFG_INTPCR[0:31] defaultly(bit
> >   reverse)
> 
> s/defaultly/by default/ I suppose. But what does that mean? Is it still
> configurable, just now through some undocumented register? If that register
> still exists, does it now have a reset value of all-ones as opposed to the ls1021
> case? If it's not configurable, then describing the situation as "by default" is
> confusing and wrong, it should just say "On LS1043A, LS1046A, SCFG_INTPCR
> is stored/read bit-reversed."
Okay, got it. Will update it in v3. Thanks.
> 
> 
> > - compatible "fsl,ls1088a-extirq" for LS1088A, LS208xA, LX216xA
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Biwen Li <biwen.li@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Change in v2:
> >       - add despcription of bit reverse
> >       - update copyright
> >
> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c | 10 +++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
> > b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c index 4d1179fed77c..9587bc2607fc
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
> > @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
> >  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > -
> > +/*
> > + * Author: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> If I wanted my name splattered all over the files I touch or add, I'd add it myself,
> TYVM. The git history is plenty fine for recording authorship as far as I'm
> concerned, and I absolutely abhor having to skip over any kind of legalese
> boilerplate when opening a file.
Okay, got it. Will drop it in v3. Thanks.
> 
> Rasmus