Re: [PATCH] firmware: xilinx: fix out-of-bounds access
From: Michal Simek
Date: Tue Oct 27 2020 - 08:27:52 EST
On 27. 10. 20 13:23, Rajan Vaja wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: 27 October 2020 02:53
>> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>; Michal Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>;
>> Rajan Vaja <RAJANV@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>; Rajan Vaja <RAJANV@xxxxxxxxxx>; Greg
>> Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tejas Patel
>> <TEJASP@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; git <git@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: xilinx: fix out-of-bounds access
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26. 10. 20 16:54, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> The zynqmp_pm_set_suspend_mode() and
>> zynqmp_pm_get_trustzone_version()
>>> functions pass values as api_id into zynqmp_pm_invoke_fn
>>> that are beyond PM_API_MAX, resulting in an out-of-bounds access:
>>>
>>> drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c: In function
>> 'zynqmp_pm_set_suspend_mode':
>>> drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c:150:24: warning: array subscript 2562 is above
>> array bounds of 'u32[64]' {aka 'unsigned int[64]'} [-Warray-bounds]
>>> 150 | if (zynqmp_pm_features[api_id] != PM_FEATURE_UNCHECKED)
>>> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c:28:12: note: while referencing
>> 'zynqmp_pm_features'
>>> 28 | static u32 zynqmp_pm_features[PM_API_MAX];
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Which CONFIG option/tool is reporting this issue?
>>
>>>
>>> Replace the resulting undefined behavior with an error return.
>>> This may break some things that happen to work at the moment
>>> but seems better than randomly overwriting kernel data.
>>>
>>> I assume we need additional fixes for the two functions that now
>>> return an error.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 76582671eb5d ("firmware: xilinx: Add Zynqmp firmware driver")
>>> Fixes: e178df31cf41 ("firmware: xilinx: Implement ZynqMP power management
>> APIs")
>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
>> b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
>>> index 8d1ff2454e2e..efb8a66efc68 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
>>> @@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_feature(u32 api_id)
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> /* Return value if feature is already checked */
>>> + if (api_id > ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_pm_features))
>>> + return PM_FEATURE_INVALID;
>>> +
>>> if (zynqmp_pm_features[api_id] != PM_FEATURE_UNCHECKED)
>>> return zynqmp_pm_features[api_id];
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Definitely good catch but not quite sure what should be correct reaction.
>> Rajan: Can you please take a look at it with priority?
> [Rajan] Change looks fine to me.
as is mentioned above that two functions now returns and error
PM_FEATURE_INVALID. Which means that zynqmp_pm_set_suspend_mode() and
zynqmp_pm_get_trustzone_version() fail all the time which doesn't look
correct.
M