[PATCH 5.9 130/757] media: i2c: fix error check on max9286_read call

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit e5b95c8febd504659b60a7601fd43c0ae8e4f3c0 ]

Currently the error return from the call to max9286_read is masked
with 0xf0 so the following check for a negative error return is
never true.  Fix this by checking for an error first, then masking
the return value for subsequent conflink_mask checking.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")

Fixes: 66d8c9d2422d ("media: i2c: Add MAX9286 driver")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
index 47f280518fdb6..b364a3f604861 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
@@ -405,10 +405,11 @@ static int max9286_check_config_link(struct max9286_priv *priv,
 	 * to 5 milliseconds.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
-		ret = max9286_read(priv, 0x49) & 0xf0;
+		ret = max9286_read(priv, 0x49);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return -EIO;
 
+		ret &= 0xf0;
 		if (ret == conflink_mask)
 			break;
 
-- 
2.25.1