Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: arm64: ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 doesn't return SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Wed Oct 28 2020 - 18:18:37 EST


On 2020-10-26 13:25, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 08:47:50AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
According to the SMCCC spec[1](7.5.2 Discovery) the
ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 function id only returns 0, 1, and
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED.

0 is "workaround required and safe to call this function"
1 is "workaround not required but safe to call this function"
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is "might be vulnerable or might not be, who knows, I give up!"

SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED might as well mean "workaround required, except
calling this function may not work because it isn't implemented in some
cases". Wonderful. We map this SMC call to

0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
1 is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE

For KVM hypercalls (hvc), we've implemented this function id to return
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED, 0, and SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED. One of those
isn't supposed to be there. Per the code we call
arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() to figure out what to return for this
feature discovery call.

0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE

Let's clean this up so that KVM tells the guest this mapping:

0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
1 is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE

Note: SMCCC_RET_NOT_AFFECTED is 1 but isn't part of the SMCCC spec

Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0028/latest [1]
Fixes: c118bbb52743 ("arm64: KVM: Propagate full Spectre v2 workaround state to KVM guests")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

I see that before commit c118bbb52743 ("arm64: KVM: Propagate full
Spectre v2 workaround state to KVM guests") we had this mapping:

0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE

so the return value '1' wasn't there then. Once the commit was merged we
introduced the notion of NOT_REQUIRED here when it shouldn't have been
introduced.

Changes from v2:
* Moved define to header file and used it

Changes from v1:
* Way longer commit text, more background (sorry)
* Dropped proton-pack part because it was wrong
* Rebased onto other patch accepted upstream

arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c | 2 --
arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c | 2 +-
include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
index 25f3c80b5ffe..c18eb7d41274 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
@@ -135,8 +135,6 @@ static enum mitigation_state spectre_v2_get_cpu_hw_mitigation_state(void)
return SPECTRE_VULNERABLE;
}

-#define SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_RET_UNAFFECTED (1)
-
static enum mitigation_state spectre_v2_get_cpu_fw_mitigation_state(void)
{
int ret;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
index 9824025ccc5c..25ea4ecb6449 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
val = SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS;
break;
case SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED:
- val = SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED;
+ val = SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_RET_UNAFFECTED;
break;
}
break;
diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
index 15c706fb0a37..0e50ba3e88d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
+++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@
ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32, \
0, 0x7fff)

+#define SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_RET_UNAFFECTED 1

I thought we'd stick this in asm/spectre.h, but here is also good:

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>

Will, if you're about to send fixes to Linus, can you please pick
this one up?

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...