On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:38 PM Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The minimum and maximum limits for resources assigned to a given
resource group are programmed in pairs, with the limits for two
groups set in a single register.
If the number of supported resource groups is odd, only half of the
register that defines these limits is valid for the last group; that
group has no second group in the pair.
Currently we ignore this constraint, and it turns out to be harmless,
If nothing currently calls it with an odd number of registers, is this
a bugfix or a new feature (anticipating future expansion, I guess)?