Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] docs: add fail_lsm_hooks info to fault-injection.rst

[Dmitry Vyukov]

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 6:34 PM Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
> > In addition to this global one, what do you think about per-hook fault
> > injection,
> > i.e. /sys/kernel/debug/fail_lsm_hooks/<FUNC>/retval ?
>
> I was thinking about this, but decided to begin with a simple version
> that could definitely be useful in practice (for syzbot/syzkaller it is just
> necessary to have a fault injection capability that will be triggered via
> fail-nth). If per-hook fault injection can also be useful to someone, I
> can try to add it as well.

Yes, before we add it, it would be useful to have a clear use case
(otherwise we can add an unused thing, or implement it in a way that
slightly misses the use case).
Note that fail-nth allows to fail a single concrete site for testing,
though it's not super convenient for this as one would need to figure
out the right N first. But as a one-off test it should do.


> > In this case, we need a fault_attr for each hook. (Maybe, we can use the same
> > technique that is used to define security_hook_heads).
>
> Yes, that technique should help to implement the feature in a very concise
> way. Thanks for the suggestion.