Re: [PATCH kernel v2 1/2] dma: Allow mixing bypass and normal IOMMU operation

[Alexey Kardashevskiy]

On 28/10/2020 03:48, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +static inline bool dma_handle_direct(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_handle)
> > +{
> > +       return dma_handle >= dev->archdata.dma_offset;
> > +}
>
> This won't compile except for powerpc, and directly accesing arch members
> in common code is a bad idea.  Maybe both your helpers need to be
> supplied by arch code to better abstract this out.


rats, overlooked it :( bus_dma_limit is generic but dma_offset is in 
archdata :-/


> >   	if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops))
> >   		addr = dma_direct_map_page(dev, page, offset, size, dir, attrs);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_OPS_BYPASS_BUS_LIMIT
> > +	else if (dev->bus_dma_limit &&
> > +		 can_map_direct(dev, (phys_addr_t) page_to_phys(page) + offset + size))
> > +		addr = dma_direct_map_page(dev, page, offset, size, dir, attrs);
> > +#endif
>
> I don't think page_to_phys needs a phys_addr_t on the return value.
> I'd also much prefer if we make this a little more beautiful, here
> are a few suggestions:
>
>   - hide the bus_dma_limit check inside can_map_direct, and provide a
>     stub so that we can avoid the ifdef
>   - use a better name for can_map_direct, and maybe also a better calling
>     convention by passing the page (the sg code also has the page), 

It is passing an address of the end of the mapped area so passing a page 
struct means passing page and offset which is an extra parameter and we 
do not want to do anything with the page in those hooks anyway so I'd 
keep it as is.


> and
>     maybe even hide the dma_map_direct inside it.

Call dma_map_direct() from arch_dma_map_page_direct() if 
arch_dma_map_page_direct() is defined? Seems suboptimal as it is going 
to be bypass=true in most cases and we save one call by avoiding calling 
arch_dma_map_page_direct(). Unless I missed something?


> 	if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops) ||
> 	    arch_dma_map_page_direct(dev, page, offset, size))
> 		addr = dma_direct_map_page(dev, page, offset, size, dir, attrs);
>
> >   	BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir));
> >   	if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops))
> >   		dma_direct_unmap_page(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_OPS_BYPASS_BUS_LIMIT
> > +	else if (dev->bus_dma_limit && dma_handle_direct(dev, addr + size))
> > +		dma_direct_unmap_page(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> > +#endif
>
> Same here.
>
> >   	if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops))
> >   		ents = dma_direct_map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_OPS_BYPASS_BUS_LIMIT
> > +	else if (dev->bus_dma_limit) {
> > +		struct scatterlist *s;
> > +		bool direct = true;
> > +		int i;
> > +
> > +		for_each_sg(sg, s, nents, i) {
> > +			direct = can_map_direct(dev, sg_phys(s) + s->offset + s->length);
> > +			if (!direct)
> > +				break;
> > +		}
> > +		if (direct)
> > +			ents = dma_direct_map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
> > +		else
> > +			ents = ops->map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
> > +	}
> > +#endif
>
> This needs to go into a helper as well.  I think the same style as
> above would work pretty nicely as well:

Yup. I'll repost v3 soon with this change. Thanks for the review.


>   	if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops) ||
> 	    arch_dma_map_sg_direct(dev, sg, nents))
>   		ents = dma_direct_map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
>   	else
>   		ents = ops->map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_OPS_BYPASS_BUS_LIMIT
> > +	if (dev->bus_dma_limit) {
> > +		struct scatterlist *s;
> > +		bool direct = true;
> > +		int i;
> > +
> > +		for_each_sg(sg, s, nents, i) {
> > +			direct = dma_handle_direct(dev, s->dma_address + s->length);
> > +			if (!direct)
> > +				break;
> > +		}
> > +		if (direct) {
> > +			dma_direct_unmap_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
> > +			return;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +#endif
>
> One more time here..

--
Alexey