Re: [PATCH] seqlock: avoid -Wshadow warnings

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:34:10AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:58 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 05:50:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > -     unsigned seq;                                                   \
> > > +     unsigned __seq;                                                 \
> >
> > > -     unsigned seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s);                        \
> > > +     unsigned _seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s);                       \
> >
> > > -     unsigned seq = __seqcount_sequence(s);                          \
> > > +     unsigned __seq = __seqcount_sequence(s);                        \
> >
> > Can we have a consistent number of leading '_' ?
> 
> Not really ;-)

Duh.. ok, I'll take it as is.