Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/9] mm/vmscan: Consider anonymous pages without swap

[Dave Hansen]

On 10/29/20 1:14 AM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> With this patch, we will use always the atomic version
> get_nr_swap_pages from now on. Is that ok? I guess so, but it might
> warrant a mention in the changelog?

I _think_ it's OK.  But, you're right that it's a potential behavior
change that's not mentioned in the changelog.

I'll mention it in the changelog and see if I can dream up any other
practical implications from this change.

Thanks for taking a look!