Re: [PATCH v22 01/12] landlock: Add object management

[Jann Horn]

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:30 AM Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 29/10/2020 02:05, Jann Horn wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 9:04 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> A Landlock object enables to identify a kernel object (e.g. an inode).
> >> A Landlock rule is a set of access rights allowed on an object.  Rules
> >> are grouped in rulesets that may be tied to a set of processes (i.e.
> >> subjects) to enforce a scoped access-control (i.e. a domain).
[...]
> >> diff --git a/security/landlock/object.c b/security/landlock/object.c
> > [...]
> >> +void landlock_put_object(struct landlock_object *const object)
> >> +{
> >> +       /*
> >> +        * The call to @object->underops->release(object) might sleep e.g.,
> >
> > s/ e.g.,/, e.g./
>
> I indeed prefer the comma preceding the "e.g.", but it seems that there
> is a difference between UK english and US english:
> https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/16172/should-i-always-use-a-comma-after-e-g-or-i-e
> Looking at the kernel documentation makes it clear:
> $ git grep -F 'e.g. ' | wc -l
> 1179
> $ git grep -F 'e.g., ' | wc -l
> 160
>
> I'll apply your fix in the whole patch series.

Ooh, sorry. I didn't realize that that's valid in UK English...