Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: display: himax,hx8837: Add Himax HX8837 bindings

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Lubomir,

Thank you for the patch.

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:07:59AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> Himax HX8837 is a secondary display controller used to drive the panel
> on OLPC platforms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> Changes since v4:
> - Rob's Reviewed-by
> 
> Changes since v3:
> - Moved to bindings/display/
> - Added the ports
> - Converted to YAML
> - Removed Pavel's Ack, because the changes are substantial
> 
> Changes since v2:
> - s/betweend/between/
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - s/load-gpio/load-gpios/
> - Use interrupt bindings instead of gpio for the IRQ
> 
>  .../bindings/display/bridge/himax,hx8837.yaml | 96 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 96 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/himax,hx8837.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/himax,hx8837.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/himax,hx8837.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..f5b0a00f5089d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/himax,hx8837.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +# Copyright (C) 2018,2019,2020 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/bridge/himax,hx8837.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: HX8837 Display Controller Device Tree Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: himax,hx8837
> +
> +  reg:
> +    const: 0xd
> +
> +  load-gpios:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +    description: GPIO specifier of DCON_LOAD pin (active high)
> +
> +  stat-gpios:
> +    minItems: 2
> +    description: GPIO specifier of DCON_STAT0 and DCON_STAT1 pins (active high)
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +    description: Interrupt specifier of DCON_IRQ pin (edge falling)
> +
> +  ports:
> +    type: object
> +
> +    properties:
> +      port@0:
> +        type: object
> +        description: |
> +          Video port for RGB input.
> +
> +      port@1:
> +        type: object
> +        description: |
> +          Video port connected to the panel.
> +
> +    required:
> +      - port@0
> +      - port@1

No regulators ?

> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - load-gpios
> +  - stat-gpios

Do stat-gpios need to be mandatory ? The driver in patch 2/2 doesn't
seem to use them, could we have boards where those signals are not
connected to GPIOs ?

> +  - interrupts
> +  - ports
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +
> +    i2c {
> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> +        #size-cells = <0>;
> +        

Could you please avoid spaces or tabs at end of lines ? There are three
other occurrences below.

> +        lcd-controller@d {
> +            compatible = "himax,hx8837";
> +            reg = <0x0d>;
> +            stat-gpios = <&gpio 100 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>,
> +                         <&gpio 101 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +            load-gpios = <&gpio 142 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +            interrupts = <&gpio 124 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> +    
> +            ports {
> +                #address-cells = <0x01>;
> +                #size-cells = <0x00>;
> +    
> +                port@0 {
> +                    reg = <0x00>;

reg = <0> should be fine. Same below.

With thse small issues addressed,

> +                    dcon_rgb_in: endpoint {
> +                        remote-endpoint = <&lcd0_rgb_out>;
> +                    };
> +                };
> +    
> +                port@1 {
> +                    reg = <0x01>;
> +                    dcon_gettl_out: endpoint {
> +                        remote-endpoint = <&panel_dettl_in>;
> +                    };
> +                };
> +            };
> +        };
> +    };

It's customary to end bindings with

...

(not sure why though, given that it seems to work find without)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart