HiCodes like the following
Am 02.11.20 um 09:46 schrieb tiantao (H):
在 2020/11/2 16:32, Thomas Zimmermann 写道:
HiNow there seems to be no driver to check the return value of
Am 30.10.20 um 10:27 schrieb Tian Tao:
drm_irq_uninstall can handle the case where dev->irq_enable is false,
so Remove redundant null check.
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c
index 0c1b40d..b71589b1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c
@@ -246,13 +246,13 @@ static int hibmc_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(dev);
- if (dev->irq_enabled)
- drm_irq_uninstall(dev);
-
+ drm_irq_uninstall(dev);
Removing this check would at least result in an error, [1] so rather
leave it in for now.
drm_irq_uninstall
True. No clean-up code should ever fail. But currently, it's not handled
by drm_irq_uninstall().
A better fix would be to have drm_irq_uninstall() return early with a
warning if IRQs are disabled. And for most drivers, a managed version of
drm_irq_install() would be useful.
Best regards
Thomas
Instead, we could discuss if drm_irq_install() should become a managed
interface.
Codes like the following
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
index 09d6e9e..572357c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
@@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ int drm_irq_uninstall(struct drm_device *dev)
bool irq_enabled;
int i;
+ if(!dev->irq_enabled || !dev)
+ return 0;
Best regards
Thomas
[1]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c#L201
pci_disable_msi(dev->pdev);
+
hibmc_kms_fini(priv);
hibmc_mm_fini(priv);
dev->dev_private = NULL;
+
return 0;
}