Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Support EDID reading

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Doug Anderson (2020-11-02 08:37:21)
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 9:37 AM Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Stephen.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:17:34PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > This patch series cleans up the DDC code a little bit so that
> > > it is more efficient time wise and supports grabbing the EDID
> > > of the eDP panel over the aux channel. I timed this on a board
> > > I have on my desk and it takes about 20ms to grab the EDID out
> > > of the panel and make sure it is valid.
> > >
> > > The first two patches seem less controversial so I stuck them at
> > > the beginning. The third patch does the EDID reading and caches
> > > it so we don't have to keep grabbing it over and over again. And
> > > finally the last patch updates the reply field so that short
> > > reads and nacks over the channel are reflected properly instead of
> > > treating them as some sort of error that can't be discerned.
> > >
> > > Stephen Boyd (4):
> > >   drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Combine register accesses in
> > >     ti_sn_aux_transfer()
> > >   drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Make polling a busy loop
> > >   drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Read EDID blob over DDC
> > >   drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Update reply on aux failures
> >
> > Series looks good. You can add my a-b on the full series.
> > Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I can apply after Douglas have had a look at the patches he did not r-b
> > yet.
> 
> They look fine to me now assuming that Stepehn has tested patch #1
> enough that we're confident that the slight change in ordering isn't
> going to mess anything up.

I did test it but the test isn't thorough enough to cover the timeout
case. I'll resend with v1 of this patch and pick up acks and include
Sam on To line.