[PATCH 5.9 040/391] lockdep: Fix preemption WARN for spurious IRQ-enable

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit f8e48a3dca060e80f672d398d181db1298fbc86c ]

It is valid (albeit uncommon) to call local_irq_enable() without first
having called local_irq_disable(). In this case we enter
lockdep_hardirqs_on*() with IRQs enabled and trip a preemption warning
for using __this_cpu_read().

Use this_cpu_read() instead to avoid the warning.

Fixes: 4d004099a6 ("lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion")
Reported-by: syzbot+53f8ce8bbc07924b6417@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 85d15f0362dc5..3eb35ad1b5241 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -3681,7 +3681,7 @@ void lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(unsigned long ip)
 	if (unlikely(in_nmi()))
 		return;
 
-	if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
+	if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
 		return;
 
 	if (unlikely(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())) {
@@ -3750,7 +3750,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigned long ip)
 		goto skip_checks;
 	}
 
-	if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
+	if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
 		return;
 
 	if (lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()) {
-- 
2.27.0