[PATCH 5.4 020/214] futex: Fix incorrect should_fail_futex() handling

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Mateusz Nosek <mateusznosek0@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 921c7ebd1337d1a46783d7e15a850e12aed2eaa0 ]

If should_futex_fail() returns true in futex_wake_pi(), then the 'ret'
variable is set to -EFAULT and then immediately overwritten. So the failure
injection is non-functional.

Fix it by actually leaving the function and returning -EFAULT.

The Fixes tag is kinda blury because the initial commit which introduced
failure injection was already sloppy, but the below mentioned commit broke
it completely.

[ tglx: Massaged changelog ]

Fixes: 6b4f4bc9cb22 ("locking/futex: Allow low-level atomic operations to return -EAGAIN")
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Nosek <mateusznosek0@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200927000858.24219-1-mateusznosek0@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/futex.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 5660c02b01b05..17fba7a986e0f 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1594,8 +1594,10 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_pi_state *pi_
 	 */
 	newval = FUTEX_WAITERS | task_pid_vnr(new_owner);
 
-	if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true)))
+	if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true))) {
 		ret = -EFAULT;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
 
 	ret = cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval);
 	if (!ret && (curval != uval)) {
-- 
2.27.0