Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drivers/tty: delete break after return or goto

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:17:56PM +0800, Bernard wrote:
> 
> 
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2020-11-04 19:02:53
> To:  Bernard Zhao <bernard@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc:  Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx>,Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>,Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>,NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>,linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,opensource.kernel@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drivers/tty: delete break after return or goto>On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 02:53:29AM -0800, Bernard Zhao wrote:
> >> This patch sereies optimise code like:
> >> {
> >> case XXX:
> >> 	return XXX;
> >> 	break; //The break is meanless, so just delete it.
> >> case YYY:
> >> 	goto YYY;
> >> 	break; //The break is meanless, so just delete it.
> >> ......
> >> }
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@xxxxxxxx>
> >> 
> >> ---
> >> Bernard Zhao (2):
> >>   drivers/tty/nozomi.c: delete no use break after goto
> >>   drivers/tty/serial/imx.c: delete no use break after return
> >
> >That is not the subject of the patches you sent out, what broke?
> 
> Hi:
> 
> I am sorry that I am a little confused:
> The patch series`s subject is "drivers/tty: delete break after return or goto"
> and the blurb is:
> This patch sereies optimise code like:
> {
> case XXX:
> 	return XXX;
> 	break; //The break is meanless, so just delete it.
> case YYY:
> 	goto YYY;
> 	break; //The break is meanless, so just delete it.
> ......
> }
> last, the modified files are:
> Bernard Zhao (2):
>   drivers/tty/nozomi.c: delete no use break after goto
>   drivers/tty/serial/imx.c: delete no use break after return
> 
> Is there something wrong that I didn`t catch?

The above lines do not match up with the subject lines of the patches
you sent out, so something went wrong.

thanks,

greg k-h