On 04.11.2020 14:13, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
On 04.11.2020 14:06, Markus Reichl wrote:
Am 04.11.20 um 13:25 schrieb Marek Szyprowski:sdhci_0 and mshc_0 both operate on the same physical MMC0 bus, so this
On 04.11.2020 11:25, Markus Reichl wrote:How to deal then with sdhci_0 (from exynos4.dtsi) vc. mshc_0 (from
Recently introduced async probe on mmc devices can shuffle block IDs.Like in the OdroidXU3-family patch, I would use 0 for the eMMC (mshc_0)
Pin them to fixed values to ease booting in evironments where UUIDs
ar not practical.
Use newly introduced aliases for mmcblk devices from [1].
[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11747669/
Signed-off-by: Markus Reichl <m.reichl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi
index a5c1ce1e396c..aa10d5bc7e1c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi
@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@
#include "exynos-mfc-reserved-memory.dtsi"
/ {
+ aliases {
+ mmc0 = &sdhci_2;
+ mmc1 = &mshc_0;
and 2 for the SD-card (sdhci_2).
exynos4412.dts)?
is not an issue. They cannot be used simultaneously. The latter is just
faster, the first one has been left there mainly for the software
compatibility.
I've thought a bit more on this and I would simply prefer to add generic
MMC aliases to the top-level Exynos dtsi files (3250, 4210, 4412, 5250,
5410, 5420) to keep Linux logical MMC bus numbers in sync with the HW
bus numbers on all boards.
Best regards