Re: [PATCH 11/11 v3] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:13:17 +0100
Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> JFYI, the code reading and writing the cache looks good to me.
> 
> It is still possible that some entries might stay unused (filled
> with zeroes) but it should be hard to hit in practice. It
> is good enough from my POV.

You mean the part that was commented?

> 
> I do not give Reviewed-by tag just because I somehow do not have power
> to review the entire patch carefully enough at the moment.

No problem. Thanks for looking at it.

I'm adding a link to this thread, so if someone wants proof you helped out
on this code, you can have them follow the links ;-)

Anyway, even if I push this to linux-next where I stop rebasing code
(because of test coverage), I do rebase for adding tags. So if you ever get
around at looking at this code, I can add that tag later (before the next
merge window), or if you find something, I could fix it with a new patch and
give you a Reported-by.

-- Steve