On 11/7/20 6:58 PM, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
On 11/7/20 2:20 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 11/7/20 11:16 AM, John Hubbard wrote:But if you really disagree, then I'd go with, just drop the patch entirely, because
On 11/7/20 11:05 AM, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
...From: John Hubbard [mailto:jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx]
it doesn't really make things better as written...IMHO anyway. :)
Just imagine a case, we don't enable DEBUG_FS but we enable GUP_TEST, we will
get an image with totally useless code section since GUP_TEST depends on debugfs
entry to perform any useful functionality.
Looking at the choices, from the user's (usually kernel developer's) experience:
a) The user enables GUP_TEST, then boots up, runs, and is briefly surprised by a
runtime failure. But it's a very quick diagnosis: "open: No such file or directory",
when trying to make that ioctl call. The path indicates that it's a debug fs path,
so the solution is pretty clear, at least for the main audience.
b) The other choice: the user *never even sees* GUP_TEST as a choice. This especially
bothers me because sometimes you find things by poking around in the menu, although
of course "you should already know about it"...but there's a lot to "already know"
in a large kernel.
From a user experience, it's way better to simply see what you want, and select it
in the menu. Or, at least get some prompt that you need to pre-select something else.