On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:52 AM Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Ah, good catch ..my bad ..should have move vigilant...another patch on the
s/doens't/doesn't/p
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
index 7cc7af2a6822..a92cb137293a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ uint32_t amdgpu_display_supported_domains(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
* to avoid hang caused by placement of scanout BO in GTT on certain
* APUs. So force the BO placement to VRAM in case this architecture
* will not allow USWC mappings.
- * Also, don't allow GTT domain if the BO doens't have USWC falg set.
+ * Also, don't allow GTT domain if the BO doesn't have USWC falg set.
Applied. Care to send a patch to also fix the spelling of "flag"?
Thanks,
Alex
*/
if ((bo_flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_CPU_GTT_USWC) &&
amdgpu_bo_support_uswc(bo_flags) &&
--
2.26.2
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature