Re: [PATCH 17/19] drm/radeon/radeon_kms: Fix misnaming of 'radeon_info_ioctl's dev param

[Lee Jones]

On Mon, 09 Nov 2020, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:10:13PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 09 Nov 2020, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Alex,
> > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 02:50:35PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 4:50 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> > > > >
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c:226: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'radeon_info_ioctl'
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c:226: warning: Excess function parameter 'rdev' description in 'radeon_info_ioctl'
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c | 2 +-
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> > > > > index 0d8fbabffcead..21c206795c364 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> > > > > @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static void radeon_set_filp_rights(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > > >  /**
> > > > >   * radeon_info_ioctl - answer a device specific request.
> > > > >   *
> > > > > - * @rdev: radeon device pointer
> > > > > + * @dev: radeon device pointer
> > > > 
> > > > This should be:
> > > > + * @dev: drm device pointer
> > > 
> > > good spot. I am continuing the work on radeon and will post a patchset
> > > that contains only radeon fixes with Lee's patches and a few more by me.
> > > I will fix the above.
> > 
> > What do you mean by "continuing on"?
> > 
> > How will you prevent your work from conflicting with my current effort?
> 
> Quoting from previous mail in this thread:
> 
>   "
>   > > How would you like me to move forward?
>   >
>   > Fix the thousand of warnings in other places :-)
>   > I will take a look at radeon and post a new series based on your work
>   > with all W=1 warnings fixed.
> 
>   I'll drop this patch and carry on ploughing through the rest of them.
> "
> 
> Here I promised you to fix all warnings in the radeon driver.
> And despite this being more work than anticipated a promise is a
> promise. So therefore I started working on this.
> 
> If you want to do the rest of the radeon driver you are welcome and I
> will gladly drop this again. Just let me know your preference.

That was the plan.  To continue on and solve as many warnings as I can
before I start bumping into more serious issues like the one mentioned
above.  If you'd like to solve the radeon_init() issue right away;
however, that would be super helpful.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog