Re: [PATCH] sysctl: move local variable in proc_do_large_bitmap() to proper scope

[Nathan Chancellor]

On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:11:07AM +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> make clang-analyzer caught my attention with:
> 
>   kernel/sysctl.c:1511:4: warning: Value stored to 'first' is never read \
>   [clang-analyzer-deadcode.DeadStores]
>                           first = 0;
>                           ^
> 
> Commit 9f977fb7ae9d ("sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap") introduced
> proc_do_large_bitmap(), where the variable first is only effectively used
> when write is false; when write is true, the variable first is only used in
> a dead assignment.
> 
> So, simply remove this dead assignment and put the variable in local scope.
> 
> As compilers will detect this unneeded assignment and optimize this anyway,
> the resulting object code is identical before and after this change.
> 
> No functional change. No change to object code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> applies cleanly on v5.10-rc3 and next-20201106
> 
> Luis, Kees, Iurii, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch.
> 
>  kernel/sysctl.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index ce75c67572b9..cc274a431d91 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -1423,7 +1423,6 @@ int proc_do_large_bitmap(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  			 void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
>  {
>  	int err = 0;
> -	bool first = 1;
>  	size_t left = *lenp;
>  	unsigned long bitmap_len = table->maxlen;
>  	unsigned long *bitmap = *(unsigned long **) table->data;
> @@ -1508,12 +1507,12 @@ int proc_do_large_bitmap(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  			}
>  
>  			bitmap_set(tmp_bitmap, val_a, val_b - val_a + 1);
> -			first = 0;
>  			proc_skip_char(&p, &left, '\n');
>  		}
>  		left += skipped;
>  	} else {
>  		unsigned long bit_a, bit_b = 0;
> +		bool first = 1;
>  
>  		while (left) {
>  			bit_a = find_next_bit(bitmap, bitmap_len, bit_b);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>